Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Counterinsurgency results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 35.7% saturation with 2,473 hits. Analysis detected 12,385 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,930 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Counterinsurgency is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Counterinsurgency
Topic details
Total words: 6,930
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 35.7%35.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 19.3%19.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.4%15.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.9%8.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 35.7%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.9%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos