Topic summary
⁠59%2 analyzed articles/videos392 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Counterfeit Goods results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 231 hits. Analysis detected 1,885 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,348 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (4,200 of 16,503 topics). This Counterfeit Goods is worse (more manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group.
Counterfeit Goods
Topic details
Total words: 1,348
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510074.6% percentile
4.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.1%17.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.2%14.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.5%10.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.6%14.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 7.6%7.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 3.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos