Topic summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video577 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Counter Drone Technology results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 408 hits. Analysis detected 3,242 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,308 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,380 of 16,562 topics). This Counter Drone Technology is worse (more manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group.
Counter Drone Technology
Topic details
Total words: 2,308
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510073.6% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 17.7%17.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.0%12.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.1%5.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 13.5%13.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.5%6.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.7%12.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.8%9.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos