Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,933 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Costume Design Exhibition results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 2,598 hits . Analysis detected 8,341 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,732 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 26% (11,508 of 15,435 topics). This Costume Design Exhibition is better (less manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group. Costume Design Exhibition
Topic details
Total words: 11,732
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 22.1% 22.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 18.6% 18.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Topic 22.1%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst