Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Cost Of Sports results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 177 hits. Analysis detected 1,589 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,004 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Cost Of Sports is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Cost Of Sports
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Cost Of Sports (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 2,004
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos