Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video531 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corrections System Reform results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 277 hits. Analysis detected 2,075 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,124 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,325 of 16,562 topics). This Corrections System Reform is worse (more manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Corrections System Reform
Topic details
Total words: 2,124
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.8% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.0%13.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 5.6%5.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos