Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video910 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Takeover results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 844 hits. Analysis detected 6,335 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,730 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (2,350 of 16,562 topics). This Corporate Takeover is worse (more manipulative) than 85.80% of the peer group.
Corporate Takeover
Topic details
Total words: 2,730
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

86% percentile
025507510085.8% percentile
7.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 13.9%13.9%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 11.0%11.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 26.0%26.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 8.0%8.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 15.3%15.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 12.5%12.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 30.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 26.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 19.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 1.7%Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos