Topic summary
⁠60%2 analyzed articles/videos815 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Sustainability results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 575 hits. Analysis detected 3,914 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,884 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (8,224 of 15,787 topics). This Corporate Sustainability is better (less manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group.
Corporate Sustainability
Topic details
Total words: 3,884
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510047.9% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.2%10.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.6%12.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.9%7.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.8%14.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.9%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos