Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,862 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tim De Chant results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 640 hits . Analysis detected 6,154 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,448 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 25% (4,829 of 6,391 authors). This Tim De Chant is better (less manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group. Tim De Chant
Author details
Total words: 7,448
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.4% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.6% 8.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.6%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst