Topic summary
⁠83%3 analyzed articles/videos814 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Social Responsibility results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 375 hits. Analysis detected 4,188 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,889 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (9,028 of 16,562 topics). This Corporate Social Responsibility is better (less manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Corporate Social Responsibility
Topic details
Total words: 4,889
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.5% percentile
2.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.5%6.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.4%6.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos