Topic summary
72% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,421 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Power results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 2,113 hits . Analysis detected 14,786 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,164 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 43% (8,812 of 15,392 topics). This Corporate Power is better (less manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group. Corporate Power
Topic details
Total words: 13,164
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.8% percentile 2.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 12.3% 12.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 16.1% 16.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst