Topic summary
72%4 analyzed articles/videos4,421 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Power results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 2,113 hits. Analysis detected 14,786 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,164 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 43% (8,812 of 15,392 topics). This Corporate Power is better (less manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
Corporate Power
Topic details
Total words: 13,164
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.8% percentile
2.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 12.3%12.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.1%16.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate