Topic summary
⁠45%6 analyzed articles/videos2,958 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Layoffs results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 1,222 hits. Analysis detected 10,667 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,119 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (12,955 of 16,562 topics). This Corporate Layoffs is better (less manipulative) than 78.20% of the peer group.
Corporate Layoffs
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510021.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles12.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos