Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video721 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Investments results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.2% saturation with 654 hits. Analysis detected 3,906 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,163 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (2,534 of 16,562 topics). This Corporate Investments is worse (more manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group.
Corporate Investments
Topic details
Total words: 2,163
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510084.7% percentile
6.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 19.3%19.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 10.6%10.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.6%10.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 8.0%8.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.4%11.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 30.2%30.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 14.1%14.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 30.2%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 11.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.6%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 3.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.9%Begging the Question: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos