Topic summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video767 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Consolidation results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 444 hits. Analysis detected 2,826 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,301 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (3,571 of 16,562 topics). This Corporate Consolidation is worse (more manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group.
Corporate Consolidation
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠79%Corporate Consolidation (selected)6%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,301
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510078.4% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.9%10.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.7%9.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 14.9%14.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 19.3%19.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.7%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Bandwagon: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos