Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,300 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corn results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 759 hits . Analysis detected 2,461 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,200 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (15,131 of 16,562 topics). This Corn is better (less manipulative) than 91.40% of the peer group. Corn
Topic details
Total words: 5,200
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.6% 14.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Horn Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.0% Straw Man: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst