Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Cooling Centers results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 185 hits . Analysis detected 755 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,680 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 15,785 topics). This Cooling Centers is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Cooling Centers
Topic details
Total words: 1,680
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst