Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,121 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Convention Center Governance results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 530 hits. Analysis detected 2,144 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,484 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (13,957 of 16,562 topics). This Convention Center Governance is better (less manipulative) than 84.30% of the peer group.
Convention Center Governance
Topic details
Total words: 4,484
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510015.7% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.8%11.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.6%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos