Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Controversies results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Unattributed Quote, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 425 hits. Analysis detected 2,940 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,684 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Controversies is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Controversies
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,684
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.5%11.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Red Herring: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos