Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,149 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Controlled Substances Act results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 35.4% saturation with 1,219 hits. Analysis detected 4,516 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,447 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,712 of 16,562 topics). This Controlled Substances Act is worse (more manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group.
Controlled Substances Act
Topic details
Total words: 3,447
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510077.6% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 35.4%35.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.2%12.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.0%12.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 8.7%8.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 35.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 4.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos