Topic summary
⁠78%2 analyzed articles/videos451 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Continuing Resolution results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 247 hits. Analysis detected 1,929 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,762 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (12,712 of 24,311 topics). This Continuing Resolution is better (less manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group.
Continuing Resolution
Topic details
Total words: 2,762
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510047.7% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos