Author summary
44% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,045 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kaia Hubbard results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 327 hits . Analysis detected 2,647 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,138 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 40% (5,610 of 9,354 authors). This Kaia Hubbard is better (less manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group. Kaia Hubbard
Author details
Total words: 5,138
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Horn Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Straw Man: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst