Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video497 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Content Consumption results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Indoctrination, and Overconfidence Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 239 hits. Analysis detected 1,603 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,849 of 16,562 topics). This Content Consumption is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Content Consumption
Topic details
Total words: 1,988
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510052.6% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.0%12.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.7%6.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.2%11.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos