Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 497 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christofer Hamilton results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Indoctrination , and Overconfidence Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 239 hits . Analysis detected 1,603 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,415 of 6,261 authors). This Christofer Hamilton is worse (more manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group. Christofer Hamilton
Author details
Total words: 1,988
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.4% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.0% 12.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.7% 6.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.2% 11.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Author 6.7%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.9% Begging the Question: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Composition/Division: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.2% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst