Topic summary
ā 45% 1 analyzed article/video 1,529 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Contemporary Politics results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , False Dilemma , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 381 hits . Analysis detected 4,071 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ā 17% (13,159 of 15,758 topics). This Contemporary Politics is better (less manipulative) than 83.50% of the peer group. Contemporary Politics
Topic details
Total words: 6,116
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.5% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst