Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Consumer Packaged Goods results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 53.7% saturation with 685 hits. Analysis detected 2,244 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Consumer Packaged Goods is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Consumer Packaged Goods
Topic details
Total words: 1,276
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 53.7%53.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 15.4%15.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 17.2%17.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.3%11.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.3%12.3%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 53.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.3%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos