Topic summary
45% 2 analyzed articles/videos 760 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consumer Fraud results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 531 hits . Analysis detected 4,264 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,664 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 52% (8,007 of 16,562 topics). This Consumer Fraud is worse (more manipulative) than 51.70% of the peer group. Consumer Fraud
Topic details
Total words: 4,664
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.7% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.4% 11.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst