Topic summary
⁠61%2 analyzed articles/videos1,355 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consumer Finance results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Pessimism Bias, and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 589 hits. Analysis detected 3,872 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,757 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (10,383 of 15,689 topics). This Consumer Finance is better (less manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group.
Consumer Finance
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,757
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510033.8% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos