Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video531 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consumer Feedback results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 345 hits. Analysis detected 2,369 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,124 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (4,910 of 16,562 topics). This Consumer Feedback is worse (more manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group.
Consumer Feedback
Topic details
Total words: 2,124
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.4% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.2%16.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 11.1%11.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.5%8.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Red Herring: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos