Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 276 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consumer Affordability results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 45.4% saturation with 376 hits . Analysis detected 2,174 faulty-reasoning hits from 828 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.4% and a BS Rank of 98% (421 of 16,562 topics). This Consumer Affordability is worse (more manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group. Consumer Affordability
Topic details
Total words: 828
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
98% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 97.5% percentile 16.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles828 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 45.4% 45.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 39.9% 39.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 39.9% 39.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 21.5% 21.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 40.3% 40.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 17.3% 17.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 13.3% 13.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Optimism Bias: Topic 45.4%, sitewide 6.0% Framing Effect: Topic 40.3%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 39.9%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 39.9%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 21.5%, sitewide 4.6% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 13.3%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Recency Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 2.7% Halo Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 6.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst