Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video595 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Construction Violations results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Unattributed Quote, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 44.7% saturation with 1,065 hits. Analysis detected 3,285 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,380 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (3,328 of 15,775 topics). This Construction Violations is worse (more manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group.
Construction Violations
Topic details
Total words: 2,380
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510078.9% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 44.8%44.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 11.0%11.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 11.2%11.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 11.4%11.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.9%6.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 44.8%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 11.0%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos