Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video974 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Constitutional History results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Hindsight Bias, and Indoctrination, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 321 hits. Analysis detected 2,829 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,896 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (12,914 of 16,562 topics). This Constitutional History is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group.
Constitutional History
Topic details
Total words: 3,896
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510022.0% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.3%5.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos