Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video368 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conspiracies - Plots results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Anecdotal, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 161 hits. Analysis detected 1,031 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,472 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,574 of 16,562 topics). This Conspiracies - Plots is worse (more manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
Conspiracies - Plots
Topic details
Total words: 1,472
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510054.3% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.4%9.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos