Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,348 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conservative Women results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 1,262 hits. Analysis detected 6,719 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,392 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 57% (7,252 of 16,533 topics). This Conservative Women is worse (more manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group.
Conservative Women
Topic details
Total words: 5,392
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510056.1% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 23.4%23.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 5.5%5.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 23.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos