Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Conservative Hope results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 44.1% saturation with 711 hits. Analysis detected 4,479 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,614 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 15,762 topics). This Conservative Hope is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Conservative Hope
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
ā 0%Conservative Hope (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 1,614
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaningā€¦Sitewide 1.4%Topic 42.4%42.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 44.0%44.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 19.1%19.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.8%11.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.2%15.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 6.4%6.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.0%11.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 44.0%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 42.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 0.0%Horn Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos