Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,965 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conservative Funding results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.5% saturation with 3,497 hits. Analysis detected 17,030 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,860 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,795 of 16,562 topics). This Conservative Funding is worse (more manipulative) than 52.90% of the peer group.
Conservative Funding
Topic details
Total words: 11,860
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510052.9% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles11.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 29.5%29.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.0%10.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 29.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.0%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos