Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video451 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Connecticut Christmas Movie Trail results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 47.2% saturation with 638 hits. Analysis detected 3,779 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,353 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (492 of 15,414 topics). This Connecticut Christmas Movie Trail is worse (more manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group.
Connecticut Christmas Movie Trail
Topic details
Total words: 1,353
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

97% percentile
025507510096.8% percentile
15.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 32.7%32.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 26.1%26.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 47.1%47.1%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 22.5%22.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 25.4%25.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 28.3%28.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 22.9%22.9%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.2%13.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 47.1%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 32.7%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 28.3%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 26.1%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 25.4%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 22.9%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Topic 22.5%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 6.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 4.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 6.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 0.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%Composition/Division: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos