Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video364 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional War Powers results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 412 hits. Analysis detected 2,613 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,456 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (2,559 of 16,562 topics). This Congressional War Powers is worse (more manipulative) than 84.60% of the peer group.
Congressional War Powers
Topic details
Total words: 1,456
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510084.6% percentile
6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 20.9%20.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 18.5%18.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 10.1%10.1%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Topic 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.2%10.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.2%10.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.1%6.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.3%15.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 28.3%, sitewide 26.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 20.9%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Circular Reasoning: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 0.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.3%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos