Topic summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video289 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Procedure results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 37.5% saturation with 433 hits. Analysis detected 2,451 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (1,941 of 16,562 topics). This Congressional Procedure is worse (more manipulative) than 88.30% of the peer group.
Congressional Procedure
Topic details
Total words: 1,156
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

88% percentile
025507510088.3% percentile
7.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 27.5%27.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 37.5%37.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.4%20.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.8%14.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 11.7%11.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.5%8.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 16.0%16.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 8.1%8.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 37.5%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 27.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing Effect: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 3.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.9%Straw Man: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Horn Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.4%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos