Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Congressional Legislation results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 1,145 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,972 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Congressional Legislation is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Congressional Legislation
Topic details
Total words: 1,972
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Middle Ground: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos