Topic summary
⁠85%2 analyzed articles/videos936 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Campaigns results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 764 hits. Analysis detected 4,898 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,734 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (10,013 of 16,562 topics). This Congressional Campaigns is better (less manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group.
Congressional Campaigns
Topic details
Total words: 5,734
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510039.5% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.3%13.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos