Topic summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video612 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congregational Governance results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 270 hits. Analysis detected 1,709 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,836 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (6,091 of 16,562 topics). This Congregational Governance is worse (more manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group.
Congregational Governance
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠64%Congregational Governance (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,836
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.2% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 11.4%11.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.7%14.7%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.6%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos