Author summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video612 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adrian Ashford results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 270 hits. Analysis detected 1,709 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,836 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (1,810 of 6,359 authors). This Adrian Ashford is worse (more manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group.
Adrian Ashford
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠72%Adrian Ashford (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,836
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

72% percentile
025507510071.5% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.8%8.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 11.4%11.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.7%14.7%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Author 11.4%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.6%False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos