Topic summary
62% 1 analyzed article/video 732 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Confederate Symbolism results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 369 hits . Analysis detected 2,096 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,196 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 65% (5,872 of 16,562 topics). This Confederate Symbolism is worse (more manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group. Confederate Symbolism
Topic details
Total words: 2,196
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.5% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 16.8% 16.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.8% 13.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Tu Quoque: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Special Pleading: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.3% Red Herring: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst