Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Concertgoer Death results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Negativity Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 412 hits. Analysis detected 1,509 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Concertgoer Death is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Concertgoer Death
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
ā 0%Concertgoer Death (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 2,388
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 17.3%17.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.8%1.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 13.1%13.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Red Herring: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos