Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Concert Tragedy results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 418 hits. Analysis detected 1,853 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,604 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,539 topics). This Concert Tragedy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Concert Tragedy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,604
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.6%13.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos