Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video458 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Company Sale results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 46.5% saturation with 639 hits. Analysis detected 4,003 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,374 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.7% and a BS Rank of 94% (926 of 15,342 topics). This Company Sale is worse (more manipulative) than 94.00% of the peer group.
Company Sale
Topic details
Total words: 1,374
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

94% percentile
025507510094.0% percentile
11.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 35.4%35.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 44.5%44.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 46.5%46.5%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 15.2%15.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 19.4%19.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 16.0%16.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 14.7%14.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 11.8%11.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 46.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 44.5%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 35.4%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 4.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos