Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,390 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Company Profiles results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 410 hits. Analysis detected 3,484 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,560 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (12,939 of 16,562 topics). This Company Profiles is better (less manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group.
Company Profiles
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,560
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510021.9% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.9%4.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos