Topic summary
ā 49%1 analyzed article/video400 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Sentiment results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 180 hits. Analysis detected 1,136 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,200 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ā 67% (5,586 of 16,562 topics). This Community Sentiment is worse (more manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group.
Community Sentiment
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 67%Community Sentiment (selected)4%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,200
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510066.3% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.8%12.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.8%4.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.0%8.0%Fundamental Attribution Eā€¦Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos