Dallas readers react to historic cemetery possibly being moved 44%

By Kelly Dearmore54%

7/24/2026, 1:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 602 faulty-reasoning hits from 400 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47.1% and a BS Rank of 44% (12,328 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 56.30% of the article peer group.

City Hall might soon be no more. 
AT&T will leave its downtown headquarters in the near future. 
The Dallas Mavericks and Dallas Stars each plan to move to other areas of North Texas. 
But a downtown Dallas without Pioneer Cemetery just seems like the city would be screwing around with forces we ought not to engage with in such a fashion. 
Last week we reported that “a historic downtown cemetery has found itself in the crosshairs of a group skeptical about the direction of development in downtown Dallas.” 
The article explains that this is where you can find the graves of many of the people whose highly recognizable names fill up the Dallas street map, as well as early mayors and veterans of the War of 1812, the Texas Revolution and the Civil War. 
The brutalist City Hall isn’t even 50 years old. 
Pioneer Cemetery was established in 1849. 
Some residents connected to the Save City Hall coalition say they spotted surveyors working around Pioneer Cemetery recently. 
In a statement, a spokesperson for the city told us everything is on the up and up when it comes to the cemetery, however. 
“Pioneer Park is currently under a plan to refurbish the steers and rider, fix the drainage and replant. 
There is no plan to change the site into something different,” the statement from the city said. 
As you might guess. 
Some of our loyal readers and social media followers had some thoughts on the prospect of such old gravesites being messed with. 
“This city is fixing to get cursed (or even more cursed)” 
 VelociCrafter on Instagram 
“FIFA still looking for something to paint over.” 
 Hector on Facebook 
“The metaphors are getting kind of loud.” 
 Ken on Instagram 
“Can't have a cemetary by the casino.” 
 Robbie on Facebook 
“Dallas… where even the dead aren't safe from the developers.” 
 Ric on Facebook 
“Interesting that they wanna move the cemetery to old city park that was also dismantled last year. 
And by that I mean every single piece of furniture in those buildings were sold in an estate sale! 
No respect for history.” 
 Lane on Facebook 
“City of dallas can you please stop being sh*tty for two seconds I beg of you.” 
 Lauren on Instagram 
Have something to add? 
Send your thoughts or story ideas to editorial@dallasobserver.com. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.3%Kelly Dearmore: 4.8%Dallas Observer: 4.0%Confirmation Bias10.3%This article: 4.3%Kelly Dearmore: 1.9%Dallas Observer: 0.6%Anchoring Bias4.3%This article: 20.8%Kelly Dearmore: 6.9%Dallas Observer: 3.3%Availability Heuristic20.8%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Kelly Dearmore: 7.7%Dallas Observer: 7.8%Framing Effect2.3%This article: 1.8%Kelly Dearmore: 0.6%Dallas Observer: 0.7%Loss Aversion1.8%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 2.9%Dallas Observer: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 3.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 9.8%Kelly Dearmore: 5.1%Dallas Observer: 1.2%Pessimism Bias9.8%This article: 15.5%Kelly Dearmore: 12.8%Dallas Observer: 3.1%Negativity Bias15.5%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.3%Dallas Observer: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%Kelly Dearmore: 1.8%Dallas Observer: 0.7%In-Group Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 3.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%Kelly Dearmore: 0.5%Dallas Observer: 0.6%Primacy Effect1.5%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 1.3%Dallas Observer: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.0%Kelly Dearmore: 2.0%Dallas Observer: 4.0%Appeal to Authority6.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.3%Kelly Dearmore: 7.2%Dallas Observer: 3.1%Hasty Generalization4.3%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.7%Dallas Observer: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 5.5%Kelly Dearmore: 1.8%Dallas Observer: 0.7%Bandwagon5.5%This article: 19.0%Kelly Dearmore: 15.0%Dallas Observer: 5.2%Appeal to Emotion19.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.3%Kelly Dearmore: 2.8%Dallas Observer: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.3%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 9.3%Kelly Dearmore: 3.1%Dallas Observer: 3.1%Anecdotal9.3%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.8%Kelly Dearmore: 0.6%Dallas Observer: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.8%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 11.3%Kelly Dearmore: 3.8%Dallas Observer: 1.7%Unattributed Quote11.3%This article: 6.8%Kelly Dearmore: 2.3%Dallas Observer: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection6.8%This article: 9.0%Kelly Dearmore: 8.0%Dallas Observer: 7.7%Biased Writer Voice9.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.0%Dallas Observer: 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Kelly Dearmore: 0.7%Dallas Observer: 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.0%

400 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers22%attributed speech313writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageVelociCrafter on Instagram • 11 words • 0.0% coverageVelociCrafter on Instagram • 4 words • 0.0% coverageHector on Facebook • 8 words • 0.0% coverageHector on Facebook • 4 words • 0.0% coverageKen on Instagram • 7 words • 0.0% coverageKen on Instagram • 4 words • 0.0% coverageRobbie on Facebook • 7 words • 0.0% coverageRobbie on Facebook • 4 words • 0.0% coverageRic on Facebook • 10 words • 0.0% coverageRic on Facebook • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageLane on Facebook • 4 words • 0.0% coverageLauren on Instagram • 16 words • 0.0% coverageLauren on Instagram • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Ric on Facebook

71%flagged-word coverage
14 attributed words16% of attributed speech74% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Unattributed Quote-14.4 ptsWriter: 14.4%Ric on Facebook: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-11.5 ptsWriter: 11.5%Ric on Facebook: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-8.6 ptsWriter: 8.6%Ric on Facebook: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.6 ptsWriter: 2.6%Ric on Facebook: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.