Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,397 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Response To Raids results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 44.5% saturation with 1,867 hits. Analysis detected 5,976 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,191 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (2,473 of 16,562 topics). This Community Response To Raids is worse (more manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group.
Community Response To Raids
Topic details
Total words: 4,191
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510085.1% percentile
6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 44.5%44.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 33.2%33.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 30.9%30.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 10.9%10.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 44.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 33.2%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 30.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Horn Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.0%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos